Link the Lectern design canvas as the design system (#148) #151
No reviewers
Labels
No milestone
No project
No assignees
3 participants
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set
Reference
schaefera/utStudyBIble!151
Loading…
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "docs/design-system-link"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
What
Adds a
## Design systemsection toCLAUDE.mdnaming the "Lectern design language" canvas as the record of how the app should look, and saying that each view redesigned under #148 goes onto it when its PR merges. The owner chose the existing canvas over a new design-sync project on 2026-11-03: standalone Claude Design goes read-only on 2026-12-14, and the canvas is already an artifact in Claude.Blast radius
Tier: leaf
Trunk paths touched: none
Testing tier: ship on sight (docs)
Gate / rollback: revert this merge.
Proof
docs/10-design.md.Review
Reviewer: pending
Review-Confidence: not audited (leaf)
Confidence by part
tokens.jsoncomes from a local copy of its project files from 2026-10-30.🤖 Generated with Claude Code
Level: medium (leaf, docs). Reviewed commit:
605c0bf7a0. Range: origin/main...HEAD.Files reviewed: CLAUDE.md, docs/10-design.md (grep of the claims), docs/09-quality-gates.md (grep for design canvas).
Findings: none. The canvas URL and the "C · Ink and lapis" direction match docs/10-design.md lines 1-4, and that file does hold the decisions and colour roles. I did not check the claim that the canvas has no tokens.json. I also could not confirm that #148 is the redesign tracking issue, because the repo has no other reference to it.