Commit graph

3 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Austin Schaefer
f55188e36f Fix issues from code review: shell-escaping gap, exit code, and more
All checks were successful
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 51s
CI / test (pull_request) Successful in 3m35s
CI / audit (pull_request) Successful in 13s
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 6m57s
A single-agent code review of this branch's diff (builder/pipeline/
publisher/sanity/hash + main/config/fetcher/state/verifier changes)
found six real issues, all fixed here:

- builder.rs: validate_shell_safe only rejected a literal single quote
  and newline, written for the single-quoted PKGBUILD fields. But
  asset_name (via install_source) and binary_name land in the install()
  line, which is necessarily double-quoted so ${srcdir}/${pkgdir} can
  expand — where $, backtick, and backslash are still live. Not
  currently exploitable (the one variable component, version, is already
  independently constrained by validate_pkgver's strict charset), but a
  latent gap relying on that coincidence rather than the validator
  actually covering its real use context. Widened the reject-list to
  cover both quoting styles, added regression tests including one at the
  generate_pkgbuild level. Corrected SPEC.md's "single-quoted" claim to
  match.
- pipeline.rs: a verification failure returned Ok(()) from
  process_package, so run_check never counted it as a failure and the
  process exited 0 even on a failed cryptographic/attestation check —
  exactly the event a monitoring setup (systemd OnFailure=, cron
  mail-on-error) most needs a non-zero exit to catch. Now bails, which
  run_check already treats as a package failure. Added an integration
  test against a mocked GitHub server exercising this exact path.
- builder.rs: find_built_package hardcoded the .pkg.tar.zst suffix, so a
  box with a different PKGEXT in makepkg.conf would report a false
  "makepkg failed" for a build that actually succeeded. Widened to match
  any .pkg.tar.* compression. Added direct unit tests (it had none).
- pipeline.rs: a newer tier 4-6 version silently overwrote a still-
  unreviewed older pending version with no indication anything was
  superseded. Now says so explicitly.
- hash.rs: builder/verifier each read a whole downloaded artifact into
  memory via std::fs::read just to hash it, doubling peak memory for no
  reason since the file's already on disk. Added sha256_hex_file,
  streamed in fixed-size chunks; both callers switched to it.
- Deduplicated two near-identical test-only "write an executable shell
  script" helpers (publisher.rs, sanity.rs) into a shared
  src/test_support.rs.

75 tests (was 63), cargo make ci clean. Re-verified end to end against
the real astral-sh/uv release after all six fixes — build, sanity check,
and publish into a scratch repo all still succeed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-17 12:06:40 +02:00
Austin Schaefer
3f30e0acc6 Add ARCHITECTURE.md and apply it to this PR's code
All checks were successful
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 54s
CI / test (pull_request) Successful in 4m6s
CI / audit (pull_request) Successful in 17s
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 6m19s
Researched current industry practice on code organization/maintainability
(Ousterhout's deep modules and information hiding, package-by-feature vs.
package-by-layer, functional-core/imperative-shell testability, tech-debt
prevention via ADR-equivalent inline rationale) and wrote it into
ARCHITECTURE.md as a set of concrete, project-specific rules rather than
a generic essay — each principle cites a real example already in this
codebase or fixed by this commit. Cross-linked from SPEC.md, which stays
about product design, not code organization.

Applied it to this PR's own code:

- Pulled process_package/fetch_and_verify/build_and_publish/run_review/
  approve out of main.rs into a new pipeline.rs. main.rs's own main() had
  grown to 278 lines and zero tests by treating "it's just the entry
  point" as an excuse to skip separating logic from wiring; now main.rs
  is argv dispatch only.
- Extracted decide_tier_action as a pure function (verification outcome +
  pending-state -> what to do), replacing dispatch logic that was
  previously inlined into a function that also made the real network/
  build calls. Four unit tests, no I/O, covering all four outcomes.
- Added a `//!` module doc comment to every file touched in this branch,
  each stating that module's one job in a sentence, per the "deep
  modules" principle the spec argues for.

Coverage's reported total drops (94% -> 78%) because pipeline.rs is
deliberately NOT excluded from it the way main.rs is, even though it's
mostly the same kind of untestable I/O orchestration — excluding it would
hide decide_tier_action's real unit-test coverage along with the untested
parts. Noted inline in Makefile.toml/ci.yml so the number doesn't look
like a quality regression at a glance.

Also added a project reference memory pointing at ARCHITECTURE.md rather
than duplicating its content there, per this session's own memory-hygiene
rules (architecture/conventions are derivable from the repo and shouldn't
be duplicated somewhere that can go stale).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-17 11:42:18 +02:00
Austin Schaefer
68fa648010 Close the loop: build, sanity-check, and publish for the first time
All checks were successful
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 13m14s
CI / test (pull_request) Successful in 3m35s
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 9m23s
CI / audit (pull_request) Successful in 13s
Implements the last unimplemented pipeline stage from SPEC.md: PKGBUILD
generation + makepkg (builder.rs), a post-build version sanity check
(sanity.rs), and repo-add publishing (publisher.rs), wired into main.rs
for both the tier 1-3 auto-publish path and a new tier 4-6 review queue
(`pkgwatch review` / `pkgwatch review <name> --approve`, persisted via
state::{load,save,clear}_pending_version, tracked separately from
last-published-version since approving one release isn't a standing
auto-publish grant for future ones).

Publishing targets an existing, already-registered local pacman repo
(~/.local/share/pacman/custom, `[custom]` in /etc/pacman.conf) rather
than one pkgwatch invents — found already in real use for a hand-packaged
AppImage, which resolves SPEC's open question on where the repo lives
without pkgwatch ever touching pacman.conf. Publishing stops at
`repo-add`; actually installing/upgrading (`pacman -Syu`/`pacman -S`) is
left to the operator, not run automatically.

Getting a real second package (scaleway-cli, tier 4) through the new
pipeline immediately surfaced a real gap: its pacman package is named
`scaleway-cli` but the actual binary is `scw` (confirmed via `pacman -Ql`
against the currently-installed extra package) — without a way to
declare that, the build would install alongside extra's package under
the wrong name instead of shadowing it. Added `Package::binary_name`
(config.rs) to cover it.

Every upstream-controlled string (version, asset name, download URL)
is validated before it touches generated shell content in the PKGBUILD
template — rejects anything containing a single quote or newline, since
values are embedded in single-quoted bash strings.

Verified for real, end to end: uv (tier 2) auto-built and published
against the real astral-sh/uv release with no human step; scaleway-cli
(tier 4) queued for review, then approved via `pkgwatch review
scaleway-cli --approve`, which re-verified, built, and published it —
confirmed the built package contains exactly usr/bin/scw. Both landed in
the real custom repo's database. Left scaleway-cli's real-repo review
pending rather than approving it myself: the tier 4-6 gate exists for a
human judgment call, not the agent's.

69 tests, cargo make ci clean (fmt, clippy, complexity, coverage, audit).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-17 11:13:13 +02:00