Commit graph

2 commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Austin Schaefer
68fa648010 Close the loop: build, sanity-check, and publish for the first time
All checks were successful
CI / build (pull_request) Successful in 13m14s
CI / test (pull_request) Successful in 3m35s
CI / coverage (pull_request) Successful in 9m23s
CI / audit (pull_request) Successful in 13s
Implements the last unimplemented pipeline stage from SPEC.md: PKGBUILD
generation + makepkg (builder.rs), a post-build version sanity check
(sanity.rs), and repo-add publishing (publisher.rs), wired into main.rs
for both the tier 1-3 auto-publish path and a new tier 4-6 review queue
(`pkgwatch review` / `pkgwatch review <name> --approve`, persisted via
state::{load,save,clear}_pending_version, tracked separately from
last-published-version since approving one release isn't a standing
auto-publish grant for future ones).

Publishing targets an existing, already-registered local pacman repo
(~/.local/share/pacman/custom, `[custom]` in /etc/pacman.conf) rather
than one pkgwatch invents — found already in real use for a hand-packaged
AppImage, which resolves SPEC's open question on where the repo lives
without pkgwatch ever touching pacman.conf. Publishing stops at
`repo-add`; actually installing/upgrading (`pacman -Syu`/`pacman -S`) is
left to the operator, not run automatically.

Getting a real second package (scaleway-cli, tier 4) through the new
pipeline immediately surfaced a real gap: its pacman package is named
`scaleway-cli` but the actual binary is `scw` (confirmed via `pacman -Ql`
against the currently-installed extra package) — without a way to
declare that, the build would install alongside extra's package under
the wrong name instead of shadowing it. Added `Package::binary_name`
(config.rs) to cover it.

Every upstream-controlled string (version, asset name, download URL)
is validated before it touches generated shell content in the PKGBUILD
template — rejects anything containing a single quote or newline, since
values are embedded in single-quoted bash strings.

Verified for real, end to end: uv (tier 2) auto-built and published
against the real astral-sh/uv release with no human step; scaleway-cli
(tier 4) queued for review, then approved via `pkgwatch review
scaleway-cli --approve`, which re-verified, built, and published it —
confirmed the built package contains exactly usr/bin/scw. Both landed in
the real custom repo's database. Left scaleway-cli's real-repo review
pending rather than approving it myself: the tier 4-6 gate exists for a
human judgment call, not the agent's.

69 tests, cargo make ci clean (fmt, clippy, complexity, coverage, audit).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-17 11:13:13 +02:00
Austin Schaefer
7f4bb4cccf Track scaleway-cli, add version-templated assets and combined checksums
Wire up scaleway/scaleway-cli as a watched package (extra's copy lags
weeks behind upstream). Getting a real second package running exposed
gaps uv's config never hit:

- asset_pattern/checksum_asset_pattern now support a {version}
  placeholder for release assets that embed the version in the
  filename (checker::version_from_tag strips a tag's leading `v`).
- same-origin-sha256 now matches the checksum line by filename instead
  of assuming a single-hash file, to support combined multi-asset
  checksum files like scaleway-cli's SHA256SUMS.
- latest_github_release now confirms each Atom-feed candidate against
  the releases API instead of trusting the newest entry outright —
  scaleway-cli publishes a `-dbg1` tag with no real Release object that
  otherwise sorts newest in the feed.

Confirmed correct against the real repo: no attestations upstream, so
tier 4 (same-origin-sha256) applies, and the checker correctly skips
the dbg1 tag to land on the real latest release.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-17 09:00:53 +02:00