schaefera/feedsignal
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests 1 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

chore/fix-some-stuff #2

Merged
schaefera merged 4 commits from chore/fix-some-stuff into main 2026-08-21 12:39:33 +00:00
Conversation 0 Commits 4 Files changed 5 +11 -18
2 changed files with 11 additions and 18 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files
Showing only changes of commit 6445f32f8a - Show all commits

2
Cargo.toml
View file

@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ members = [
[workspace.package]
edition = "2021"
version = "0.1.0"
license = "AGPL-3"
license = "AGPL-3.0-or-later"
schaefera marked this conversation as resolved Outdated
claude-bot commented 2026-08-21 11:58:37 +00:00
Outdated
Review
Copy link

AGPL-3 isn't a valid SPDX license identifier — the valid forms are AGPL-3.0-only / AGPL-3.0-or-later (or the deprecated AGPL-3.0). Tools that validate SPDX metadata (cargo-deny, crates.io) will reject this. Also this is a real license change (MIT → AGPL) bundled into a "chore" commit with no LICENSE file added to match — probably worth calling out explicitly or splitting into its own commit/PR.

`AGPL-3` isn't a valid SPDX license identifier — the valid forms are `AGPL-3.0-only` / `AGPL-3.0-or-later` (or the deprecated `AGPL-3.0`). Tools that validate SPDX metadata (cargo-deny, crates.io) will reject this. Also this is a real license change (MIT → AGPL) bundled into a "chore" commit with no LICENSE file added to match — probably worth calling out explicitly or splitting into its own commit/PR.
[workspace.dependencies]
tokio = { version = "1", features = ["full"] }

17
crates/core/src/affinity.rs
View file

@ -93,16 +93,15 @@ pub fn engagement_score(
return 0.0;
}
let mut score = match opened {
true => {
let mut score = if !opened {
schaefera marked this conversation as resolved Outdated
claude-bot commented 2026-08-21 11:58:37 +00:00
Outdated
Review
Copy link

This rewrote if !opened {0.0} else {...} as match opened { true => {...}, false => 0.0 } — a needless match-on-bool with no behavior change and extra nesting for no gain. Not currently caught by clippy in this workspace (verified cargo clippy -p feedsignal-core --all-targets -- -D warnings is clean), so it'll linger. Consider reverting to a plain if/else.

This rewrote `if !opened {0.0} else {...}` as `match opened { true => {...}, false => 0.0 }` — a needless match-on-bool with no behavior change and extra nesting for no gain. Not currently caught by clippy in this workspace (verified `cargo clippy -p feedsignal-core --all-targets -- -D warnings` is clean), so it'll linger. Consider reverting to a plain `if`/`else`.
0.0
} else {
match (dwell_seconds, estimated_read_seconds) {
(Some(dwell), Some(est)) if est > 0 => (dwell as f64 / est as f64).min(1.0),
// Opened but we don't yet know dwell time / read-time estimate:
// credit partial engagement rather than 0 or 1.
_ => 0.5,
}
}
false => 0.0
};
schaefera marked this conversation as resolved Outdated
claude-bot commented 2026-08-21 11:58:37 +00:00
Outdated
Review
Copy link

cargo fmt --check fails on this branch: the false => 0.0 arm is missing a trailing comma, plus two more spots this diff introduces further down (the multi-line assert_eq! calls in engagement_score_starred_adds_bonus / engagement_score_starred_bonus_caps_at_one, which rustfmt collapses to one line). Since CI's Format check step runs before clippy/tests, this diff fails CI as-is — run cargo fmt before merging.

`cargo fmt --check` fails on this branch: the `false => 0.0` arm is missing a trailing comma, plus two more spots this diff introduces further down (the multi-line `assert_eq!` calls in `engagement_score_starred_adds_bonus` / `engagement_score_starred_bonus_caps_at_one`, which rustfmt collapses to one line). Since CI's `Format check` step runs before clippy/tests, this diff fails CI as-is — run `cargo fmt` before merging.
if starred {
@ -366,19 +365,13 @@ mod tests {
/// 0.3 on top of the dwell-ratio score.
#[test]
fn engagement_score_starred_adds_bonus() {
assert_eq!(
engagement_score(true, Some(30), Some(60), true, false),
0.8
);
assert_eq!(engagement_score(true, Some(30), Some(60), true, false), 0.8);
}
/// The +0.3 star bonus must also respect the 1.0 ceiling, even when
/// the dwell ratio alone is already at the max.
#[test]
fn engagement_score_starred_bonus_caps_at_one() {
assert_eq!(
engagement_score(true, Some(60), Some(60), true, false),
1.0
);
assert_eq!(engagement_score(true, Some(60), Some(60), true, false), 1.0);
}
}